People v. Bullock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bullock

233 A.D.2d 958, 649 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13566

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 233 A.D.2d 958 (People v. Bullock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bullock, 233 A.D.2d 958, 649 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13566 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the suppression court’s findings that his mother invited the police into her home and thus that the police had a legitimate right to be there when they took defendant into custody are contrary to the weight of the evidence. We disagree. Although conflicting testimony was presented concerning what defendant’s mother said when the police entered the home, County Court’s resolution of that credibility issue is entitled to considerable weight, and we perceive no basis in this record to disturb it (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J.—Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the suppression court’s findings that his mother invited the police into her home and thus that the police had a legitimate right to be there when they took defendant into custody are contrary to the weight of the evidence. We disagree. Although conflicting testimony was presented concerning what defendant’s mother said when the police entered the home, County Court’s resolution of that credibility issue is entitled to considerable weight, and we perceive no basis in this record to disturb it (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J.—Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D.2d 958, 649 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bullock-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack