People v. Bullock

233 A.D.2d 958, 649 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13566
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 8, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the suppression court’s findings that his mother invited the police into her home and thus that the police had a legitimate right to be there when they took defendant into custody are contrary to the weight of the evidence. We disagree. Although conflicting testimony was presented concerning what defendant’s mother said when the police entered the home, County Court’s resolution of that credibility issue is entitled to considerable weight, and we perceive no basis in this record to disturb it (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J.—Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bullock, 233 A.D.2d 958, 649 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13566 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

233 A.D.2d 958 (People v. Bullock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodriguez
266 A.D.2d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)