People v. Rodriguez

267 A.D.2d 61, 700 N.Y.S.2d 122, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12659
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 238 A.D.2d 150

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Sudolnik, J.), rendered March 5, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (2 counts), burglary in the second degree (2 counts), and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 15 years, four terms of 10 years, and a term of 2 to 4 years, all sentences to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. The identification procedure was reasonable under the circumstances where the complainant identified defendant at a showup two hours after the robbery, but only minutes after defendant was apprehended, in close proximity to the crime scene (see, People v McBride, 242 AD2d 482, lv denied 91 NY2d 876). We find that the circumstances of the showup were not unduly suggestive (see, People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541). In any event, were we to find that the showup and in-court identifications by the complainant were inadmissible, we would find the error to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the overwhelming independent evidence of defendant’s guilt. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 267 A.D.2d 61, 700 N.Y.S.2d 122, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 61 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Duuvon
571 N.E.2d 654 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
People v. McBride
242 A.D.2d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)