People v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
77 N.E.2d 13, 297 N.Y. 703, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1162
Opinion
Judgments affirmed; no opinion. [See 297 N. Y. 783.]
Concur: Lewis, Conway, Thacher and Dye, JJ. Dissenting: Lottghran, Ch. J., Desmond and Ftjld, JJ., on the ground that this regulation of the police commissioner, as interpreted to forbid these unobjectionable advertisements on defendants’ trucks, is so entirely unrelated to traffic„ control as to be arbitrary as matter of law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 77 N.E.2d 13, 297 N.Y. 703, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1162 (N.Y. 1947).
77 N.E.2d 13 (People v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Palumbo
79 A.D.2d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
People v. Stock
88 Misc. 2d 1058 (Nassau County District Court, 1976)
People v. Wendelken
10 Misc. 2d 442 (New York City Magistrates' Court, 1957)
Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New York
336 U.S. 106 (Supreme Court, 1949)
People v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
77 N.E.2d 795 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)