People v. Palumbo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Palumbo

78 A.D.2d 684, 433 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13196

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 20, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 78 A.D.2d 684 (People v. Palumbo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Palumbo, 78 A.D.2d 684, 433 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 5, 1979, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The record fails to show that the provisions of the agreement on detainers contained in CPL 580.20 were violated. In any event, defendant’s failure to raise any issue in regard thereto at Criminal Term constitutes a waiver (cf. People v Primmer, 59 AD2d 221, affd 46 NY2d 1048). We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Martuscello and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 5, 1979, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The record fails to show that the provisions of the agreement on detainers contained in CPL 580.20 were violated. In any event, defendant’s failure to raise any issue in regard thereto at Criminal Term constitutes a waiver (cf. People v Primmer, 59 AD2d 221, affd 46 NY2d 1048). We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Martuscello and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 684, 433 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-palumbo-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack