People v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

77 N.E.2d 795, 297 N.Y. 783, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 907
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 1948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Motion by appellant for reargument denied.

Motion by appellant to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon by this court, viz. j whether section 124 of article 9 of the Traffic Regulations of the Police Commissioner of the City of New York is repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment or to section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that the Traffic Regulation aforesaid is not repugnant to said provisions of the Constitution of the United States. [See 297 N. Y. 703.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 77 N.E.2d 795, 297 N.Y. 783, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 907 (N.Y. 1948).

77 N.E.2d 795 (People v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Palumbo
79 A.D.2d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
F. T. B. Realty Corp. v. Goodman
89 N.E.2d 865 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)