People v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
This text of 77 N.E.2d 795 (People v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by appellant for reargument denied.
Motion by appellant to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon by this court, viz. j whether section 124 of article 9 of the Traffic Regulations of the Police Commissioner of the City of New York is repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment or to section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that the Traffic Regulation aforesaid is not repugnant to said provisions of the Constitution of the United States. [See 297 N. Y. 703.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 N.E.2d 795, 297 N.Y. 783, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-railway-express-agency-inc-ny-1948.