People v. Payne

212 A.D.2d 998, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1865

This text of 212 A.D.2d 998 (People v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Payne, 212 A.D.2d 998, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The verdict finding defendant guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that there is no merit to the contention that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 186-188; People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 708-709; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147), or to defendant’s remaining contentions (see, People v Julian, 41 NY2d 340; People v Millet, 156 AD2d 721, lv denied 75 NY2d 870). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Flores
639 N.E.2d 19 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Rivera
525 N.E.2d 698 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Millet
156 A.D.2d 721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 A.D.2d 998, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-payne-nyappdiv-1995.