People v. Payne

234 A.D.2d 980, 652 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13739
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Payne. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 A.D.2d 787

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant’s conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We further conclude that defendant’s sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. The contention that County Court intruded itself into the case by questioning defendant’s daughter is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and, in any event, that contention is without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J.—Rape, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Payne, 234 A.D.2d 980, 652 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 980 (People v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)