People v. Payne

212 A.D.2d 998, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1865
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Payne. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 A.D.2d 787

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The verdict finding defendant guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that there is no merit to the contention that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 186-188; People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 708-709; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147), or to defendant’s remaining contentions (see, People v Julian, 41 NY2d 340; People v Millet, 156 AD2d 721, lv denied 75 NY2d 870). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Payne, 212 A.D.2d 998, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

212 A.D.2d 998 (People v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Flores
639 N.E.2d 19 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Rivera
525 N.E.2d 698 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Millet
156 A.D.2d 721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)