People v. Ortega
49 A.D.3d 704, 852 N.Y.2d 845
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court’s [705]*705determination designating him a level two sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and therefore should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Imperato, 45 AD3d 659 [2007]; People v Bula, 41 AD3d 569 [2007]). Miller, J.P., Covello, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Ortega, 49 A.D.3d 704, 852 N.Y.2d 845 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
49 A.D.3d 704 (People v. Ortega) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Solis
52 A.D.3d 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)