People v. Bula

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bula

41 A.D.3d 569, 836 N.Y.S.2d 416

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 12, 2007·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Mullings, J.), rendered March 6, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court’s determination designating the defendant a level two sex offender is supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]) and, therefore, should not be disturbed on appeal (see People v Morris, 33 AD3d 778 [2006]; People v O’Neal, 26 AD3d 365 [2006]; People v Davis, 26 AD3d 364 [2006]). Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Florio and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Mullings, J.), rendered March 6, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court’s determination designating the defendant a level two sex offender is supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]) and, therefore, should not be disturbed on appeal (see People v Morris, 33 AD3d 778 [2006]; People v O’Neal, 26 AD3d 365 [2006]; People v Davis, 26 AD3d 364 [2006]). Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Florio and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

People v. Bula, 41 A.D.3d 569, 836 N.Y.S.2d 416 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

41 A.D.3d 569 (People v. Bula) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related