People v. Solis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Solis

52 A.D.3d 800, 859 N.Y.S.2d 383

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 2008·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), dated February 10, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court’s determination to designate him a level two sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Ortega, 49 AD3d 704 [2008]; People v Bula, 41 AD3d 569 [2007]). Rivera, J.P, Ritter, Miller and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), dated February 10, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court’s determination to designate him a level two sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Ortega, 49 AD3d 704 [2008]; People v Bula, 41 AD3d 569 [2007]). Rivera, J.P, Ritter, Miller and Dillon, JJ., concur.

People v. Solis, 52 A.D.3d 800, 859 N.Y.S.2d 383 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

52 A.D.3d 800 (People v. Solis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related