People v. Neal

73 A.D.3d 1145, 900 N.Y.S.2d 916
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 25, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 73 A.D.3d 1145 (People v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Neal, 73 A.D.3d 1145, 900 N.Y.S.2d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated May 5, 2009, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The County Court properly found, based on the evidence before it, including, inter alia, the case summary, the presen-tence report, and the statements of the victim, the defendant, [1146]*1146and a witness to the subject crimes, as well as photographic and medical documentation depicting and describing the victim’s injuries, that the People demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that an upward departure from level two to level three was warranted in this case (see People v Rios, 57 AD3d 501, 502 [2008]; People v Miller, 48 AD3d 774, 774-775 [2008]; People v Leibach, 39 AD3d 1093, 1093-1094 [2007]; People v Joslyn, 27 AD3d 1033, 1033-1035 [2006]). Dillon, J.P., Miller, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Duff
96 A.D.3d 1031 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Suber
91 A.D.3d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 A.D.3d 1145, 900 N.Y.S.2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-neal-nyappdiv-2010.