People v. Neal

73 A.D.3d 1145, 900 N.Y.S.2d 916
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 25, 2010·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated May 5, 2009, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The County Court properly found, based on the evidence before it, including, inter alia, the case summary, the presen-tence report, and the statements of the victim, the defendant, [1146]*1146and a witness to the subject crimes, as well as photographic and medical documentation depicting and describing the victim’s injuries, that the People demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that an upward departure from level two to level three was warranted in this case (see People v Rios, 57 AD3d 501, 502 [2008]; People v Miller, 48 AD3d 774, 774-775 [2008]; People v Leibach, 39 AD3d 1093, 1093-1094 [2007]; People v Joslyn, 27 AD3d 1033, 1033-1035 [2006]). Dillon, J.P., Miller, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Neal, 73 A.D.3d 1145, 900 N.Y.S.2d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

73 A.D.3d 1145 (People v. Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Duff
96 A.D.3d 1031 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Suber
91 A.D.3d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)