People v. Ludlow

187 A.D.2d 936, 592 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13927
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 1992·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record supports County Court’s [937]*937firiding that defendant, despite his limited intellectual capacity, knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his Miranda rights and agreed to speak to the police (see, People v Williams, 62 NY2d 285, 287; People v Matthews, 148 AD2d 272, 274, lv dismissed 74 NY2d 950). The record also supports the suppression court’s determination that defendant was not in custody before the Miranda warnings were given. A reasonable person, innocent of any crime, would not have believed he was in custody under the circumstances (see, People v Centano, 76 NY2d 837, 838; People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589, cert denied 400 US 851). (Appeal from Judgment of Jefferson County Court, Clary, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Boehm and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ludlow, 187 A.D.2d 936, 592 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

187 A.D.2d 936 (People v. Ludlow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Warney
299 A.D.2d 956 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Dengel
299 A.D.2d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Bray
295 A.D.2d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Ras
244 A.D.2d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Tatsey
231 A.D.2d 920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Letts
210 A.D.2d 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Thayer
210 A.D.2d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)