People v. Ras

244 A.D.2d 938, 668 N.Y.S.2d 133, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12305
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion to suppress defendant’s statement to the police. The record supports the court’s determination that defendant, despite his intellectual limitations, knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights (see, People v Tatsey, 231 AD2d 920; People v Ludlow, 187 AD2d 936, lv denied 81 NY2d 888; People v Matthews, 148 AD2d 272, 274, lv dismissed 74 NY2d 950). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J.—Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Hayes, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ras, 244 A.D.2d 938, 668 N.Y.S.2d 133, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 938 (People v. Ras) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Engert
263 A.D.2d 959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)