People v. Tatsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tatsey

231 A.D.2d 920, 648 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10810

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress his statement to the police. The record supports the court’s determination that defendant, despite his intellectual limitations, knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his Miranda rights (see, People v Ludlow, 187 AD2d 936, lv denied 81 NY2d 888; People v Matthews, 148 AD2d 272, 274, lv dismissed 74 NY2d 950). (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.—Rape, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress his statement to the police. The record supports the court’s determination that defendant, despite his intellectual limitations, knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his Miranda rights (see, People v Ludlow, 187 AD2d 936, lv denied 81 NY2d 888; People v Matthews, 148 AD2d 272, 274, lv dismissed 74 NY2d 950). (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.—Rape, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

People v. Tatsey, 231 A.D.2d 920, 648 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

231 A.D.2d 920 (People v. Tatsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related