Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Tatsey

People v. Tatsey

231 A.D.2d 920, 648 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10810
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 27, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 231 A.D.2d 920 (People v. Tatsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Tatsey, 231 A.D.2d 920, 648 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress his statement to the police. The record supports the court’s determination that defendant, despite his intellectual limitations, knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his Miranda rights (see, People v Ludlow, 187 AD2d 936, lv denied 81 NY2d 888; People v Matthews, 148 AD2d 272, 274, lv dismissed 74 NY2d 950). (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.—Rape, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ras
244 A.D.2d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 A.D.2d 920, 648 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tatsey-nyappdiv-1996.