People v. Letts

210 A.D.2d 895, 621 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13352
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record supports the suppression court’s finding that defendant, despite his illiteracy and intellectual limitations, knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his Miranda rights and agreed to speak to the police (see, People v Thayer, 210 AD2d 977 [decided herewith]; People v Ludlow, 187 AD2d 936, lv denied 81 NY2d 888; People v Matthews, 148 AD2d 272, lv dismissed 74 NY2d 950). Because defendant pleaded guilty before the court ruled on the alleged Payton violation (see, Payton v New York, 445 US 573), defendant waived his right to raise that issue on appeal (see, People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686; People v Van Asten, 159 AD2d 252; People v Woods, 156 AD2d 1012, lv denied 75 NY2d 926; People v Lewis, 140 AD2d 630). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.—Rape, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Wesley, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Letts, 210 A.D.2d 895, 621 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13352 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

210 A.D.2d 895 (People v. Letts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Carrasco
216 A.D.2d 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Porter
213 A.D.2d 1070 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)