People v. Jones

106 A.D.3d 1106, 965 N.Y.S.2d 729
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 29, 2013·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), imposed August 23, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; People v Sommerville, 104 AD3d 880 [2013]; People v McHugh, 101 AD3d 754 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 1101 [2013]; People v Badru, 98 AD3d 1132 [2012]), and thus does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, EJ., Rivera, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jones, 106 A.D.3d 1106, 965 N.Y.S.2d 729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

106 A.D.3d 1106 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Taylor
132 A.D.3d 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Floyd
112 A.D.3d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)