Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Floyd

People v. Floyd

104 A.D.3d 873, 960 N.Y.S.2d 662
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 20, 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 104 A.D.3d 873 (People v. Floyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Floyd, 104 A.D.3d 873, 960 N.Y.S.2d 662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mondo, J.), imposed February 28, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]; cf. People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 A.D.3d 873, 960 N.Y.S.2d 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-floyd-nyappdiv-2013.