People v. McHugh
101 A.D.3d 754, 954 N.Y.2d 500
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 5, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
[755]*755The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]), and thus does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, J.P., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Hall, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. McHugh, 101 A.D.3d 754, 954 N.Y.2d 500 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
101 A.D.3d 754 (People v. McHugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Floyd
112 A.D.3d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)