People v. Sommerville

104 A.D.3d 880, 960 N.Y.S.2d 661
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 20, 2013·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), imposed January 10, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]), and thus does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Mastro, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sommerville, 104 A.D.3d 880, 960 N.Y.S.2d 661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

104 A.D.3d 880 (People v. Sommerville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Taylor
132 A.D.3d 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Floyd
112 A.D.3d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Jones
106 A.D.3d 1106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)