People v. Badru

98 A.D.3d 1132, 950 N.Y.S.2d 711
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 26, 2012·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), imposed April 28, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]), and thus does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, A.PJ., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Badru, 98 A.D.3d 1132, 950 N.Y.S.2d 711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

98 A.D.3d 1132 (People v. Badru) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Floyd
112 A.D.3d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Jones
106 A.D.3d 1106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)