People v. James

2017 NY Slip Op 3968, 150 A.D.3d 1026, 52 N.Y.S.3d 233
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 17, 2017·No. 2016-00289·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the de *1027 fendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed December 17, 2015, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of her right to appeal was invalid (see People v Head, 147 AD3d 1083 [2017]; People v Bynum, 142 AD3d 1183 [2016]; People v Burnett-Hicks, 133 AD3d 773 [2015]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 2017 NY Slip Op 3968, 150 A.D.3d 1026, 52 N.Y.S.3d 233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 3968 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. James
29 N.Y.3d 1092 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)