People v. James
Opinion
Appeal by the de *1027 fendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed December 17, 2015, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s waiver of her right to appeal was invalid (see People v Head, 147 AD3d 1083 [2017]; People v Bynum, 142 AD3d 1183 [2016]; People v Burnett-Hicks, 133 AD3d 773 [2015]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2017 NY Slip Op 3968 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.