People v. James

135 A.D.3d 602, 22 N.Y.S.3d 865
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 A.D.3d 1202
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 21, 2016·No. 16738 4016/11·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), rendered April 13, 2012, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to an aggregate term of eight years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the prison term for the conviction for third-degree possession to six years, resulting in a new aggregate term of six years, and otherwise affirmed.

We find that the Allen charge, read as a whole, was balanced and not coercive (see People v Pagan, 45 NY2d 725, 727 [1978]). The court encouraged the jurors to reach a verdict if possible, while reminding them not to give up their conscientiously held positions. Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 135 A.D.3d 602, 22 N.Y.S.3d 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

135 A.D.3d 602 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pagan
380 N.E.2d 299 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)