People v. James
This text of 103 A.D.3d 588 (People v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered November 18, 2011, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s application for a downward departure (see People v Cintron, 12 NY3d 60, 70 [2009], cert denied sub nom. Knox v New York 558 US 1011 [2009]; People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]). The mitigating factors asserted by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instru[589]*589ment, and were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying sex crimes against a child (see e.g. People v Melendez, 83 AD3d 448 [1st Dept 2011]). Although defendant describes his sexual relationship with the victim as consensual, we note that it began when the victim was only 11 years old. Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 A.D.3d 588, 959 N.Y.S.2d 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-james-nyappdiv-2013.