People v. James

120 A.D.3d 1105, 992 N.Y.S.2d 401
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 A.D.3d 1249
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 2014·No. 12965 1411/08·Published

Opinion

*1106 Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert A. Sackett, J.), rendered March 12, 2012, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 10 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding for resentencing.

As the People concede, defendant is entitled to resentencing pursuant to People v Rudolph (21 NY3d 497 [2013]) for a youthful offender determination. Defendant did not make a valid waiver of the right to appeal, and, in any event, the right of an eligible defendant to such a determination is not waivable (id. at 499). Since we are ordering a new sentencing proceeding, we find it unnecessary to address defendant’s other arguments.

Concur — Friedman, J.E, Acosta, Saxe, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 120 A.D.3d 1105, 992 N.Y.S.2d 401 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

120 A.D.3d 1105 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rudolph
997 N.E.2d 457 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)