People v. Bynum

142 A.D.3d 1183, 37 N.Y.S.3d 904
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 2016·No. 2015-07636·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the de-

fendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed July 17, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The record of the plea proceeding is inadequate to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal, and thus, the purported waiver of his right to appeal is not enforceable (see People v Matos, 102 AD3d 890, 891 [2013]). Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Dickerson, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bynum, 142 A.D.3d 1183, 37 N.Y.S.3d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 1183 (People v. Bynum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rivera
2019 NY Slip Op 2906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Fitzhugh
2018 NY Slip Op 8686 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Johnson
2018 NY Slip Op 567 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Smith
2017 NY Slip Op 9282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Simon
2017 NY Slip Op 6668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. James
2017 NY Slip Op 3968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Head
2017 NY Slip Op 1384 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Oneal
2016 NY Slip Op 8886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)