People v. Matos
This text of 102 A.D.3d 890 (People v. Matos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dwyer, J.), imposed September 22, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
[891]*891Inasmuch as the record does not demonstrate that the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently, it may not be enforced (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-265 [2011]). Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 A.D.3d 890, 957 N.Y.S.2d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-matos-nyappdiv-2013.