People v. Matos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Matos

102 A.D.3d 890, 957 N.Y.S.2d 902

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 23, 2013·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dwyer, J.), imposed September 22, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

[891]*891Inasmuch as the record does not demonstrate that the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently, it may not be enforced (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-265 [2011]). Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dwyer, J.), imposed September 22, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

[891]*891Inasmuch as the record does not demonstrate that the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently, it may not be enforced (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-265 [2011]). Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

People v. Matos, 102 A.D.3d 890, 957 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

102 A.D.3d 890 (People v. Matos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related