People v. Oneal

2016 NY Slip Op 8886, 145 A.D.3d 1041, 43 N.Y.S.3d 761
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Oneal. Read the opinion of the Court — 153 A.D.3d 1281
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 28, 2016·No. 2015-11527·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed October 29, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Bynum, 142 AD3d 1183 [2016]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Dickerson, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Oneal, 2016 NY Slip Op 8886, 145 A.D.3d 1041, 43 N.Y.S.3d 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 8886 (People v. Oneal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bynum
142 A.D.3d 1183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)