People v. James

2016 NY Slip Op 8003, 144 A.D.3d 596, 41 N.Y.S.3d 418
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 A.D.3d 1202
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 2016·No. 2317 14991/90·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Angela M. Mazzarelli, J., at plea; Richard M. Weinberg, J., at sentencing), rendered June 13, 2013, convicting defendant of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of four months, unanimously affirmed.

The sentencing court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to adjudicate defendant a youthful offender (YO) (see generally People v Drayton, 39 NY2d 580 [1976]). At the time of defendant’s guilty plea in 1990, the court promised YO treatment and probation on the conditions that defendant return for sentencing and avoid additional arrests. However, defendant absconded, was convicted of a felony and numerous other offenses in another state, and did not return for sentencing until approximately 22 years after the plea. Because defendant violated the plea conditions, the plea court’s promise of YO treatment was no longer in effect, and the sentencing court’s initial statement, made before receiving and considering an updated presentence report, that it was still inclined to grant YO treatment did not constitute an enforceable promise.

Concur—Renwick, J.R, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Fein-man, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. James, 2016 NY Slip Op 8003, 144 A.D.3d 596, 41 N.Y.S.3d 418 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 8003 (People v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Drayton
350 N.E.2d 377 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)