People v. Harris

132 A.D.2d 570, 517 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49102
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 6, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), imposed April 2, 1984, upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

CPL 400.21 does not mandate a "catechism” of questioning prior to imposition of a sentence as a predicate felony offender. The procedure is sufficient if, as here, the defendant admitted that he was previously convicted of a felony and was subject to sentencing as a second felony offender (see, People v Bryant, 47 AD2d 51; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 20). Nor was the bargained-for sentence excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harris, 132 A.D.2d 570, 517 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

132 A.D.2d 570 (People v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Minor
143 A.D.2d 146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)