People v. Bryant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bryant

47 A.D.2d 513, 365 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8559

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 513 (People v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bryant, 47 A.D.2d 513, 365 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8559 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on November 10,1972, convicting appellant after trial of two counts of robbery, [514]*514first degree, and sentencing him on each count to a maximum term of seven years on each count, such terms to run consecutively, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of striking therefrom the provision that the terms of imprisonment shall run consecutively, and by adding thereto a provision to the effect that the terms of imprisonment shall run concurrently; and as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. In the light of the relevant facts and circumstances, the imposition of consecutive, rather than concurrent, terms of imprisonment constitutes excessive punishment for the crimes of which appellant has been found guilty. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Tilzer and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on November 10,1972, convicting appellant after trial of two counts of robbery, [514]*514first degree, and sentencing him on each count to a maximum term of seven years on each count, such terms to run consecutively, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of striking therefrom the provision that the terms of imprisonment shall run consecutively, and by adding thereto a provision to the effect that the terms of imprisonment shall run concurrently; and as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. In the light of the relevant facts and circumstances, the imposition of consecutive, rather than concurrent, terms of imprisonment constitutes excessive punishment for the crimes of which appellant has been found guilty. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Tilzer and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 513, 365 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bryant-nyappdiv-1975.