People v. Diomede

185 A.D.2d 709
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1992·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant, by admitting his status as a second felony offender in open court in the presence of his counsel, waived strict compliance with CPL 400.21, and was properly sentenced as a second felony offender (see, People v Blair, 59 AD2d 767; see also, People v Cates, 104 AD2d 895, 896; People v Alexander, 98 AD2d 961; People v Bryant, 47 AD2d 51, 63). We decline to modify defendant’s sentence in the interest of justice. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diomede, 185 A.D.2d 709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

185 A.D.2d 709 (People v. Diomede) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Vega
49 A.D.3d 1185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Harris
233 A.D.2d 959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)