People v. Harris
110 A.D.2d 660, 487 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48556
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 1, 1985·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The record offers no support for defendant’s arguments that his Wade and Sandoval motions were improperly denied. Nor does the record provide any support for his argument that his conviction was contrary to the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s contention that Penal Law § 70.06 is facially unconstitutional has not been preserved for appellate review and is, in any event, meritless (People v Lemon, 62 NY2d 745). The sentence imposed was not excessive. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Harris, 110 A.D.2d 660, 487 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48556 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 660 (People v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Padilla
190 A.D.2d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Wolmart
140 A.D.2d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)