People v. Giese

201 N.Y.S.3d 97, 221 A.D.3d 912, 2023 NY Slip Op 06056
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 22, 2023
Docket2021-06409
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 201 N.Y.S.3d 97 (People v. Giese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Giese, 201 N.Y.S.3d 97, 221 A.D.3d 912, 2023 NY Slip Op 06056 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Giese (2023 NY Slip Op 06056)
People v Giese
2023 NY Slip Op 06056
Decided on November 22, 2023
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 22, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
JANICE A. TAYLOR
LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.

2021-06409
2021-06411
(Ind. No. 1170/19, S.C.I. No. 1636/19)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Justin Giese, appellant.


Michelle Parisien, South Jamesport, NY, for appellant.

Raymond A. Tierney, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mark D. Cohen, J., at pleas; Richard Ambro, J., at sentences), both rendered August 19, 2021, convicting him of attempted conspiracy in the second degree under Indictment No. 1170/19, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under Superior Court Information No. 1636/19, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgements are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

DUFFY, J.P., MALTESE, TAYLOR and VENTURA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Acting Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Haynesworth
2026 NY Slip Op 01225 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026)
People v. Griffiths
2025 NY Slip Op 06726 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Purdie
2025 NY Slip Op 05535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Sinclair
2025 NY Slip Op 03743 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Wilson
2024 NY Slip Op 06567 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 N.Y.S.3d 97, 221 A.D.3d 912, 2023 NY Slip Op 06056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-giese-nyappdiv-2023.