People v. Griffiths

2025 NY Slip Op 06726
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 3, 2025
DocketInd. No. 1143/21
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 06726 (People v. Griffiths) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Griffiths, 2025 NY Slip Op 06726 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Griffiths (2025 NY Slip Op 06726)

People v Griffiths
2025 NY Slip Op 06726
Decided on December 3, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 3, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
CARL J. LANDICINO
LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.

2022-07150
(Ind. No. 1143/21)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

David Griffiths, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Anna Jouravleva of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill, Charles T. Pollak, and Rahul K. Sukesh of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Toni M. Cimino, J.), rendered September 6, 2022, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Giese, 221 AD3d 912; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252).

BARROS, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, LANDICINO and LOVE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Giese
201 N.Y.S.3d 97 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 06726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-griffiths-nyappdiv-2025.