People v. Haynesworth

2026 NY Slip Op 01225
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 2026
Docket2024-09518
StatusPublished

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 01225 (People v. Haynesworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Haynesworth, 2026 NY Slip Op 01225 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Haynesworth (2026 NY Slip Op 01225)
People v Haynesworth
2026 NY Slip Op 01225
Decided on March 4, 2026
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 4, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
LOURDES M. VENTURA
DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.

2024-09518

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

James A. Haynesworth, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 71127/24)


Paul Skip Laisure, Garden City, NY, for appellant.

Anne T. Donnelly, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Jared A. Chester of counsel; Matthew C. Frankel on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Meryl J. Berkowitz, J.), rendered September 5, 2024, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal from the judgment. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Giese, 221 AD3d 912, 912; People v Singh, 218 AD3d 500, 500).

CONNOLLY, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, VENTURA and GOLIA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Singh
190 N.Y.S.3d 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Giese
201 N.Y.S.3d 97 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 01225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-haynesworth-nyappdiv-2026.