People v. Sinclair

2025 NY Slip Op 03743
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 18, 2025
DocketInd. No. 1917/18
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 03743 (People v. Sinclair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sinclair, 2025 NY Slip Op 03743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Sinclair (2025 NY Slip Op 03743)
People v Sinclair
2025 NY Slip Op 03743
Decided on June 18, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 18, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
CARL J. LANDICINO
LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.

2021-05311
(Ind. No. 1917/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jerwayne Sinclair, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Robert Ho on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (John Hecht, J.), rendered May 27, 2021, convicting him of disorderly conduct, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal from the judgment. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Giese, 221 AD3d 912; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252).

DILLON, J.P., DOWLING, LANDICINO and LOVE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Giese
201 N.Y.S.3d 97 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 03743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sinclair-nyappdiv-2025.