People v. Diaz

2019 NY Slip Op 211
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 10, 2019
Docket8065 2604N/13
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 211 (People v. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Diaz, 2019 NY Slip Op 211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Diaz (2019 NY Slip Op 00211)
People v Diaz
2019 NY Slip Op 00211
Decided on January 10, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 10, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Gische, Oing, Singh, Moulton, JJ.

8065 2604N/13

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Adan Diaz, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Hunter Haney of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (R. Jeannie Campbell-Urban of counsel), for respondent.



Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J. at suppression motion and plea; A. Kirke Bartley, Jr., J. at sentencing), rendered July 17, 2014, as amended December 16, 2015, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of three years, held in abeyance, and the matter remanded to Supreme Court for a hearing on defendant's motion to suppress evidence.

The People concede that defendant is entitled to a Mapp/Dunaway hearing because his moving papers created a factual issue warranting a hearing, based on the information available to him at the time of the motion (see generally People v Mendoza , 82 NY2d 415 [1993). Furthermore, there are unresolved issues regarding the existence and validity of a GPS search warrant for defendant's car.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 10, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mendoza
624 N.E.2d 1017 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-diaz-nyappdiv-2019.