People v. Diaz

142 A.D.3d 1332, 38 N.Y.S.3d 460
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2016·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment [1333]*1333of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Joanne M. Winslow, J.), rendered November 12, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.75 [1] [a]). As the People correctly concede, defendant’s oral and written waivers of his right to appeal from his conviction do not encompass his challenge to the severity of his sentence and thus do not foreclose our review of that challenge (see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 927-928 [2012]; People v Tomeno, 141 AD3d 1120, 1120-1121 [2016]). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, DeJoseph, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diaz, 142 A.D.3d 1332, 38 N.Y.S.3d 460 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 1332 (People v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DIPALMA, SAMUEL, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
People v. DiPalma
145 A.D.3d 1647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)