People v. Diaz

139 A.D.3d 871, 29 N.Y.S.3d 823
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Diaz. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 A.D.3d 401
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 11, 2016·No. 2012-07938·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.), imposed November 16, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; People v Guarchaj, 122 AD3d 878, 879 [2014]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 140 [2014]; People v Pressley, 116 AD3d 794, 795-796 [2014]; People v Pelaez, 100 AD3d 803, 803-804 [2012]), and thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]; People v Roman, 84 AD2d 851 [1981]).

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diaz, 139 A.D.3d 871, 29 N.Y.S.3d 823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

139 A.D.3d 871 (People v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Guarchaj
122 A.D.3d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Roman
84 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Pelaez
100 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Pressley
116 A.D.3d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)