People v. Castillo
125 A.D.3d 684, 999 N.Y.S.2d 751
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Castillo. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 A.D.3d 678 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 4, 2015·No. 2011-04030·Published
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Balter, J.), imposed April 22, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Eng, P.J., Balkin, Chambers, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Castillo, 125 A.D.3d 684, 999 N.Y.S.2d 751 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).
125 A.D.3d 684 (People v. Castillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)