People v. Castillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Castillo

121 A.D.3d 631, 994 N.Y.S.2d 310

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 2014

Docket13383 5570/00 6358/00

StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.D.3d 631 (People v. Castillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Castillo, 121 A.D.3d 631, 994 N.Y.S.2d 310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered June 26, 2012, resentencing defendant, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 30 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]).

Concur— Tom, J.E, Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered June 26, 2012, resentencing defendant, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 30 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]).

Concur— Tom, J.E, Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D.3d 631, 994 N.Y.S.2d 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-castillo-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack