People v. Castillo
This text of 91 A.D.3d 883 (People v. Castillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in denying that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence, as the evidence at the suppression hearing permitted the Supreme Court to infer that the police officers who stopped the defendant’s vehicle had reasonable suspicion to do so based on the information that they had received minutes earlier from a radio transmission made by another officer (see People v Coleman, 62 AD3d 810, 810-811 [2009]; People v Williams, 52 AD3d 208 [2008]; People v Gonzalez, 50 AD3d 527 [2008]). Dillon, J.E, Lott, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A.D.3d 883, 936 N.Y.2d 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-castillo-nyappdiv-2012.