People v. Castillo

121 A.D.3d 631, 994 N.Y.S.2d 310
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Castillo. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 A.D.3d 678
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 2014·No. 13383 5570/00 6358/00·Published

Opinion

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered June 26, 2012, resentencing defendant, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 30 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]).

Concur— Tom, J.E, Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Castillo, 121 A.D.3d 631, 994 N.Y.S.2d 310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

121 A.D.3d 631 (People v. Castillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)