People v. Castillo

91 A.D.3d 883, 936 N.Y.2d 675
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 24, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in denying that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence, as the evidence at the suppression hearing permitted the Supreme Court to infer that the police officers who stopped the defendant’s vehicle had reasonable suspicion to do so based on the information that they had received minutes earlier from a radio transmission made by another officer (see People v Coleman, 62 AD3d 810, 810-811 [2009]; People v Williams, 52 AD3d 208 [2008]; People v Gonzalez, 50 AD3d 527 [2008]). Dillon, J.E, Lott, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Castillo, 91 A.D.3d 883, 936 N.Y.2d 675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

91 A.D.3d 883 (People v. Castillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dunbar
2020 NY Slip Op 07089 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Ceruti
133 A.D.3d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)