People v. Brown

7 A.D.3d 595, 775 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6853
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 2004·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), dated May 22, 2003, which, after a hearing, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level two sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the hearing court properly relied on his testimony and his admissions to the prison drug treatment providers in classifying him as a level two sex offender. Correction Law § 168-n (3) specifically authorizes a hearing court to utilize reliable hearsay evidence in reaching its determination (see People v Myers, 306 AD2d 334 [2003]). The Supreme Court’s determination was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and therefore will not be disturbed on appeal. Florio, J.P., Smith, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 7 A.D.3d 595, 775 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

7 A.D.3d 595 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fisher
36 A.D.3d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Cohen
34 A.D.3d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Vacanti
26 A.D.3d 732 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Hines
24 A.D.3d 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Inghilleri
21 A.D.3d 404 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Gambetta
19 A.D.3d 571 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)