People v. Cohen
This text of 34 A.D.3d 660 (People v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), dated October 7, 2005, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level two sex offender and imposed a $50 sex offender registration fee upon the defendant.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof imposing a $50 sex offender registration fee upon the defendant pursuant to Penal Law § 60.35 (1) (a) (iv); as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
There was clear and convincing evidence to support the Supreme Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level two sex offender, and thus it will not be disturbed on appeal (see People v Inghilleri, 21 AD3d 404 [2005]; People v Brown, 7 AD3d 595 [2004]; People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]).
However, the court improperly imposed the $50 sex offender registration fee upon the defendant since it is undisputed that the underlying offense was committed prior to the 2003 amendment to Penal Law § 60.35 which provided for the imposition of a sex offender registration fee (see Penal Law § 60.35 [1] [a] [iv]; People v Lloyd, 23 AD3d 296 [2005]; People v Allen, 17 AD3d 151 [2005]; see also People v Valdelamar, 122 AD2d 289 [1986]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P, Mastro, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 A.D.3d 660, 824 N.Y.S.2d 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cohen-nyappdiv-2006.