People v. Gambetta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gambetta

19 A.D.3d 571, 796 N.Y.S.2d 547, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6901

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 20, 2005·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Wong, J.), dated June 14, 2004, which, after a hearing, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level two sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination designating him a level two sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Brown, 7 AD3d 595 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Adams, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Wong, J.), dated June 14, 2004, which, after a hearing, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level two sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination designating him a level two sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Brown, 7 AD3d 595 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Adams, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

People v. Gambetta, 19 A.D.3d 571, 796 N.Y.S.2d 547, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

19 A.D.3d 571 (People v. Gambetta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related