People v. Anderson
263 A.D.2d 964, 693 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7946
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 252 A.D.2d 399 →
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed is neither unduly harsh nor severe. We have considered the remaining issues raised by defendant in his pro se supplemental brief and conclude that they lack merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Anderson, 263 A.D.2d 964, 693 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7946 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).
263 A.D.2d 964 (People v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.